Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Tips & Advice’

By: Sandeep Ayyappan (Founder & CEO of Delve)

AskForIt

You walk into the coffeeshop with a pop in your step. This is the meeting you’ve been waiting for all week. The guy whose blogs you’ve been reading for months, who you’ve tried to get three separate intros to, who finally took one and agreed to get coffee with you. You click instantly, you sit down, your sentences falling into the others at such a pace that you don’t even have time to jot down a single word in your notebook. You’re completing each other’s thoughts, you’re sharing the same world views, you’re swapping stories of people you both know. And then, with total nonchalance, he pops the question: “So, how can I be helpful?” And you wonder what it possibly was in that coffee that’s causing this giant lump in your throat.

Asking for something of value, especially of those whose accomplishments and time we respect the most, is a very difficult thing for most of us to do. There’s a natural selfishness in the act that arouses every bit of the shyness that you thought you’d overcome. Who am I to request a favor of you, we wonder. Isn’t it enough that you’ve given me the past hour of your time? How can I be greedy enough to want more?

But here’s the truth: the person on the other end of the conversation likely took the meeting because they believed you’d be someone they’d like to get to know. They may have appreciated what you’re working on or who you knew in common. They very likely had a number of people who helped them become successful, and in you they might see an earlier version of themselves. So don’t be shy – you’re there for a very good reason, and now’s the time to make the most of the opportunity.

Four thoughts that will help you nail the ask:

1. Do your research: Even before you initially reach out to this person, you should be familiar with who they are and how they could be helpful to you. What’s their current role and primary occupation? Where were they before? What sorts of career shifts have they taken and what might that say about them? What networks do you share? What have they recently blogged about/tweeted/said in public appearances?

All of these points come together in some form of a story (though be careful not to create your own narrative on someone else’s career), and being able to casually make the point that you respect your subject enough to have done your homework on them goes an exceptionally long way in impressing them. After all, any of us who make such information public – our LinkedIn profile, our tweets, our blog – expect that someone doing the work to reach out to us will have taken five minutes to look at them.

Keep in mind that their previous meeting could’ve been with someone who did a ton of homework and came extraordinarily well-prepared, and if you haven’t, you can guess which of the two follow-up emails they’ll put more effort into.

2. Know what you’re asking for: In business, help can pretty much be defined within three categories:

a. Advice: on product, on strategy, on recruiting, on management, etc.

b. Money: usually just investment or sales.

c. Introductions: usually to other people who could provide one of the above.

3. Be shameless but be realistic: There are two failure scenarios at the end of a successful meeting (one way to measure it is by how hard either party is trying to wrap it up – if your subject is delaying their next one to wrap up yours or running beyond your budgeted time, you’re in great shape). One is having an ask that is so broad that they have no idea how to actually help you, and the other is stumbling your way through the ask that it’s clear you lack the confidence to act upon whatever they might offer (not having an ask at all = you’re a rookie). If you’re an entrepreneur, you probably have a number of areas where you could use help. Narrow down your list to the five where you need the most help, and overlay that with the five where you think they’d be able to offer the most help. Across those sets of five, you’ll likely find a couple of areas of overlap. Go into the meeting with one primary area where you have a couple of concrete action items for them: intros to people that you know they know, an investment, or product feedback on an area that you know they’re good at. And then have a couple of other areas that you could mention and see whether they pounce. If you think you’ll be too hesitant or shy to make the ask, keep it simple and practice it a couple of times. And don’t ask for something too audacious – taking a junior manager at Salesforce out for coffee doesn’t make it likely that they’ll introduce you to Marc Benioff.

4. Be gracious and return the favor: While you may think of yourself as a lowly entrepreneur who couldn’t possibly be helpful to someone like who you’re talking to, you probably have a number of potential introductions to offer them. If they’re an investor, you could introduce them to amazing entrepreneurs you know, a great Meetup to check out, or the incredibly helpful app you just found. You might know of a good workspace or class or even a coffeeshop or wine bar they might like. You can always send them an interesting article that you recently read that speaks to some part of your conversation. As you build your network, you’ll find that some of the people you know might be ones you can introduce them to as well. At the very least, the follow-up email, the LinkedIn connection, and the Twitter follow (and occasional retweet?) go a long way, especially when done with genuine respect and in good faith. After all, you should be looking to build a long-term professional relationship with your subject, and not just looking for a quick connection to someone else. That may not materialize – we’re all busy – but the intent counts for a lot.

If you keep the thoughts above in mind, you’ll ace your next ask, and you’ll soon be hearing people’s asks more often than you’re delivering them!

SandeepSandeep Ayyappan is the founder & CEO of Delve, which helps people find and share important reads with their coworkers. Delve was recently named to TimeSpace, the first ever startup incubator at The New York Times, as well as a Finalist at the SXSW Accelerator and the startup “Most Likely to Succeed” at the Software and Information Industry Association’s Annual Summit. Sandeep is a Yale grad and previously worked in Energy Tech Equity Research at RBC Capital Markets.

Read Full Post »

brand

By: Nick Gottlieb (Co-Founder & CEO of Mobozi)

Most startups begin with a clear idea of what they think their product and company mission will be, and often use that idea to name their company.  When my co-founder and I started our company last year, we thought we would build a mobile video contest platform and our mission would be to make it easy for anyone to enter and win directly from their phone.  We decided on the name ‘PrizeReel’ and chose a spiffy logo with a film reel and ribbon.

Five months later we had gone through two significant pivots and were now building a platform for handling photos and videos on the mobile web, and the name PrizeReel was significantly less clever.  We had been considering rebranding for about a month when we were admitted into the Mozilla WebFWD Accelerator.  It was at that point, in mid-February, that we finally decided to pull the trigger come up with a new name and brand.

We didn’t have a really clear idea of what kind of name we wanted, but we did know we wanted something with no inherent meaning (we were still unsure if we had made our final pivot or not) and an available .com domain name.  We spent a lot of time searching available domains (namestation.com is an amazing tool for this) and a lot surveying with friends, family, and colleagues.  We really liked several names with the prefix ‘mob’ as we at least knew we would be doing something in mobile, and wanted something that was relatively easy to spell.  After 4 days of searching and deliberation we eventually settled on ‘Mobozi’.

Once we decided on the name we chose a color scheme, designed a logo (again with a lot of feedback from friends, colleagues, and customers), and went through the annoying process of changing all of our social network accounts.

Branding is hard; there are large agencies that make tons of money doing nothing but helping huge corporations on their branding.  For a small early stage startup, branding is REALLY hard. On the one hand your company name, logo, and possibly a tagline are the first impression of your company, but on the other hand you are still working out the finer points of what exactly your product is, who your customers are, and what your company’s mission is.  My advice on branding for early stage startups is to keep your brand flexible and simple.  Until you have really figured out your product/market fit and have a customer base don’t be afraid to experiment.  Ask people their opinion, observe their initial reaction to different tag lines and logos.  You will certainly iterate and improve your product hundreds of times in early stages of your company, don’t be afraid to do the same thing with your brand.

Nick GottliebNick is a developer, designer, and is passionate about products.  When not working on Mobozi, he spends his time surfing, playing basketball, and traveling the world.  Before founding Mobozi, he worked for a consulting firm in Japan and an interactive agency in Dallas.

Read Full Post »

We kicked off our first elevator pitch workshop and roundtables event at our Silicon Valley location a couple of months ago and it turned out to be a big hit.  In preparation of our fundraising series coming up, we thought it’d be a good time to recap on some best practices for elevator pitches.

Having a polished elevator pitch is something every entrepreneur should adopt.  The purpose of the elevator pitch is to convey the message of your company in a simple and concise manner.  You need to solicit interest from an investor before you lose their attention, so the best points must be delivered early and quickly.  Here are a few guidelines to help you as you build your elevator pitch.

1.  Framework

  • What market are you in?
  • What urgent problem are you solving?
  • What is the size of the opportunity?
  • Why will you win (differentiation, barriers to entry, unfair advantage)?
  • Where is the validation (customers, investors, etc.)?

2.  If available, be sure to include strong customer validation.  What better way to prove your company’s validity than by having a clear example?

3.  Do not use industry jargon.  You can’t assume your audience has the same industry knowledge as you.  Keep your language simple.  Investors are people too.

4. Practice your delivery.  A good elevator pitch takes numerous practices before it’s perfected.

5.  Timing.  The best elevator pitches are the ones that can be conveyed in under a minute (30 seconds is ideal).  It’s called an elevator pitch for a reason.  We once heard from an investor that he had to sit through a 50 minute elevator pitch.  Make it known that he vowed to never get on that “elevator” again.

6.  Your elevator pitch is not a tagline.  Taglines are catch phrases that are intended to highlight an overall story in a few words.  An elevator pitch is the story about your business (this does not replace your business plan).

7.  The best elevator pitches are built up from an analogy or kernel that creates the “a ha” moment for the person listening to your pitch.

Some of the best pitches we’ve heard were from those who were just having a casual conversation with us.  A casual 30 seconds conversation.  Let us know your best elevator pitch.

Read Full Post »

By Jindou Lee (Co-Founder & CEO, Happy Inspector)

I remember always asking what the ideal team for a startup was. It’s a question that I know many other startup entrepreneurs ask as well. To answer the question, let me share some of my experiences and lessons I’ve learnt.

I have been a solo founder before and it’s hard. Very hard! I was doing everything from customer development, product development, scoping, payroll, pouring coffee, fund raising etc… You name it. I did it. However the hardest thing I found is that it’s not the good times that are the issue but it’s the tough times when it really starts to take its toll. There were many times I wanted to throw in the towel or just turn off the Internet! I’ll never do that again.

What I see in a lot startups that struggle is either a single founder that’s a programmer/engineer or a marketing / business guy. I won’t say it’s a complete recipe for disaster but what I will say is that it makes it slightly harder to succeed in the early stages of a startup. Some of the more common issues a tech heavy team will face is that they will be building magnificent products from an engineering standpoint but they will have trouble finding customers. Or they will be building over engineering the ‘perfect’ solution, spending an eternity to developing features that the end user won’t even use. In short they fall into the “build it and they will come syndrome. (Read Steve Blank’s, The Four Steps to the Epiphany)

On the other end of the scale, a team that’s too business/marketing/hustling focused will find themselves faced with a different predicament. They will be able to sell ice to Eskimos but when it comes to actually making the ice, they won’t have a freezer. (Ok bad analogy). The point I’m trying to make is that they won’t have a tech head to help steer the product in the right direction. They also tend to end up selling impossible to execute solutions to your customers or might underestimate how difficult it is to develop certain features. I’ve been in a few startups when this has happened and the person that ends up suffering is the customer, with broken promises and a crap product. Inevitably, what always happens in this scenario when the solo founder is business guy is that it leads to distrust between them and the engineering team.

In my current startup, Happy Inspector, I’m extremely fortunate to have 2 other co-founders that are super smart and technically minded. The team is well rounded because our customer discovery is in tandem with product development. I’m not saying it’s a sure fire recipe for success but it does increase the chances of us creating a great product that solves a real problem. When you provide value, you can be guaranteed to have a successful business.

Successful people are always looking for opportunities to help others. Unsuccessful people are always asking, What’s in it for me?

Brian Tracy

There are very few people in the world the can do it alone. In fact all the best successes come in pairs; Jobs and Wozniak, Gates and Allen, Starsky and Hutch, Peanut butter and Honey… you get the point.

So if you ever have the temptation to go it alone or want to increase your chances of success, find someone with complimentary skills to you.

What do you think? Do you agree that more heads are better than one? Do you have any horror or success stories you want to share? Any questions?

View the original entry here.

About the blogger: Jindou Lee is the co-founder and CEO of Happy Inspector; making inspections paperless. His previous life includes being a UX designer at Midway Games, semi-pro soccer player, two previous tech exits and a ton of other failed businesses.  

Read Full Post »

By Stephanie Sharron (Partner and Co-Chair, Silicon Valley Technology Transactions and Licensing Practice, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP)

This year I divided my New Year’s Resolutions into the personal and the professional.  On the personal side of things, I registered for GymPact.  In case you haven’t heard, GymPact is this wonderful little business idea that is just genius.  The concept is as follows.  If you are paying a ton of money on an unused gym membership and need that little extra kick in the pants that the $100 plus (or pick your number) monthly fee isn’t providing, perhaps allowing Gym Pact to tack on an extra $10 per week will help.  Yes, folks, that’s the concept.  You make a pact to make it to the gym a certain number of times a month, and if you fulfill your pact, then GymPact pays you a certain amount based on how many users failed to make their pact in that week.  But if you don’t, you get charged.  Week One, Day Six, no gym.  If I don’t make it tomorrow, I’m funding the enterprise.  So enough of my personal resolutions and on to the professional ones.  2012 is my year of getting my social media act together.  I was one of the earliest adopters of LinkedIn and am a Facebook junkie.  Now I have hopped onto the social media bandwagon professionally.  I am very lucky to work with clients that have become close friends in the course of our engagements.  When I write this blog, I imagine I am sitting over dinner with any one of my clients chatting about the last deal that we did together: what went right and lessons learned.  This year is the year of getting useful content out into the ether in a form that is entertaining, practical and provided in easily digestible bites.  I look forward to taking the journey with you!

A short note about the format and content of this blog: The format of this blog will be intentionally brief.  In future blog posts you can expect to see quick tips, lessons learned, checklists and tools that highlight lessons learned from my observations in doing technology transactions over the course of my career.  I won’t typically take deep dives into the intricate details of legal analyses (although when the bleeding edge of technology intersects with fascinating legal questions, I may stray into that territory).  Instead, the updates and blog posts here are intended to be easily consumed in 10 minutes or less.  Note that substantive comments on the topics presented are welcome and I do hope you will “like,” “share,” and help me build the following for this endeavor!

One Good Question: What is the most important step that any company can take to efficiently negotiate and close a technology deal?

Answer:  The solid non-binding term sheet.

The value of a clear and thoughtful term sheet is often underestimated.  A solid term sheet defines in reasonable detail the terms of the business transaction.  It is not typically binding and often does not even need to be signed.  Term sheets are valuable because they establish the expectations of the parties as to the main deal points to be covered in the to-be-negotiated final agreements.  Any deal, whether involving technology or not, can benefit from a term sheet that describes at the overall purpose, product or service, price and other financial terms, performance metrics, duration of the relationship, and termination rights.  For technology deals, the term sheet typically also should cover each party’s rights in intellectual property and data.  Other significant deal terms should also be captured.  When these issues are not fleshed out up front, the parties end up throwing documents back and forth that are prepared without much context and no understanding of what the other party’s concerns or limits might be.  And yes, even lawyers don’t relish being sent down the path of drafting agreements with little or no direction as to the parties’ understanding of the deal.  Spending time on the front end negotiating the key terms of the deal can save weeks of work and thousands of dollars in legal fees down the road.

A Few Thoughts on Engaging Assistance From Trusted Legal Advisors:

Not all companies can afford to have an experienced trusted commercial lawyer by their side throughout every discussion leading up to and through negotiations, but experienced negotiators bring these trusted advisors into the process earlier than their less experienced counterparts.  Why?  Because these individuals have found advisors that help them do a better job than they can do on their own—they understand the business interests of both sides, are creative, suggest solutions, spot minefields that may not be transparent, and understand how decisions get made within their client’s and often the other side’s organizations. It’s as simple as that.

What if your company cannot afford this kind of help?  My suggestion is to obtain advice at critical points in the deal cycle.  Get help on the term sheet and in preparing or reviewing the initial draft of the agreement.  Talk to your trusted legal advisor about where the key pain points are in the proposed terms.  Have them walk you through those that will impact the future flexibility of the company to do other deals, or that are likely to raise questions from future funding sources or potential acquirers during due diligence.  Most start-ups are prepared to take on risk.  The key is being able to distinguish those risks that allow the company to preserve business flexibility from those that strip the company of building potent value for itself and its prospective investors or acquirers.

Disclaimer: The views on this blog are my own and not that of Orrick or its clients. Nothing on this blog is provided for, nor should it be relied upon as, legal advice. This blog is for informational purposes only. This site is not intended to substitute for obtaining legal advice from competent, independent, legal counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. Your use of this site is not intended to create and does not constitute a lawyer-client relationship.

This post was originally posted at Good Question!

About the guest blogger: Stephanie Sharron is a Partner and Co-Chair of the Technology Transactions and Licensing Practice in Orrick’s Silicon Vally office. She represents both private and public companies, from emerging growth through the Fortune 50, across industries. Stephanie has extensive experience in executive-level strategic collaborations and outsourcing transactions.

Read Full Post »

Following our 10 common startup mistakes panel which featured Kevin Chou, CEO of Kabam, Gary Kremen, CEO & Founder of Sociogramics (also Founder of match.com), Joe Kraus, Partner at Google Ventures (also Founder of Excite), and Phil Sanderson, Managing Director at IDG Ventures, our very own, Larry Kane, sat down with Joe Kraus for a one-on-one interview about Google Ventures and other venture firms, startup mistakes, and how to get in touch with investors.

Larry: How do you see Google Ventures v. other strategic venture funds or traditional VCs?

Joe: We’re not strategic, we only invest for financial return. We invest in companies that are competitive to Google, have nothing to do with Google’s businesses, sometimes has something to do with Google’s businesses. We have companies that exit to competitors or non-related businesses, so fundamentally people should put us in the bucket of traditional venture capital firms [...] The primary value proposition is we’re going to introduce you to potential partners and customers and we’re going to help you hire senior management teams. And I’ll tell you, when I was at a very early stage, what I cared most about, what I needed most was great designers because how my product looked and felt, did it tell a story, was it easy to use, that made a huge difference with traction and traction is how I raised money. Second thing I needed, I didn’t need a senior management team, I didn’t know exactly what my product was going to be, I needed great engineers…

Larry: How would you suggest an entrepreneur to approach Google Ventures?

Joe: The sad reality of the venture business is that referrals from people are the best way in. Cold emails and other things, as much as I want to, the reality is I’m more than inundated with the total number of people that you’re getting introduced to from people that you trust and know. That’s always the best way.

Larry: What is an immediate red flag which you most often see when reading business plans, executive summaries, or hearing a pitch? What [mistake] do people routinely make that you know is a problem?

Joe: There’s no one thing that I can point to as ‘here’s the fatal mistake that so many people make.’ But I do feel that the way an entrepreneur pitches his or her business is an indication of the way that they lead, the way that they talk to customers. If they can’t explain the business successfully to an investor, it probably means they don’t have enough clarity in their own lines about what businesses they are really in. It probably means it’s very difficult for them to explain to customers as well…

To hear more from Joe about common mistakes and engaging with investors, watch the short video.

Read Full Post »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 28 other followers